AMD Ryzen 5000 APU will surpass Intel Tiger Lake processors

AMD Ryzen 5000 APU will surpass Intel Tiger Lake processors
The first test of the future flagship APU AMD Ryzen 7 5800U has appeared on the Network, and it indicates that the new AMD hybrid processors will be noticeably faster than the current ones. Especially when considering single-core performance.

For a long time, the recognized leaders in single – core tests were Intel processors-due to the higher clock speed. Things started to change with the third generation of the Ryzen APU, and the Ryzen 4000 (mobile) and Ryzen 5000 (desktop) became even faster in single-threaded tests. Interestingly, AMD did not even need to raise the frequency much for this. And now we can see another progress in single-threaded computing on the example of Ryzen 7 5800U.

APU AMD Ryzen 5000 will destroy Intel Tiger Lake processors. Ryzen 7 5800U is 40 faster than Ryzen 7 4800U%
This APU was tested in Geekbench 5, the result was 1421 points in a single-threaded test and 6450 points in a multithreaded test. It turns out that the Ryzen 7 5800U is 38% faster than the Ryzen 7 4800U in a single – threaded test and 10% faster in a multithreaded test. The frequency, of course, also increased, but not much – on duty 100-200 MHz: 1.9-4.44 GHz against 1.8-4.2 GHz in Ryzen 7 4800U. The Ryzen 7 5800U includes an 8-core CPU with multithreading support – and in this regard, the new APU fully corresponds to the Ryzen 7 4800U.

Are the Ryzen 5000U a problem for Tiger Lake? Yes, they are, and what else. For example, recently Geekbench tested a powerful Core i7-11370H-Yes, Quad-core, but this is a representative of a series of powerful processors with a TDP of 35-45 watts. Its frequency only starts at 3.3 GHz! So in a single-threaded test, his result is exactly the same as that of the hero of this news. Well, in a multithreaded test, the Ryzen 7 5800U is, of course, much faster. At the same time, the frequency of the AMD CPU is much lower, and the maximum TDP value is 25 watts.
Views: 62 |
Total comments: 0